In SDN Forum, i’ve found this question: Hi Experts, In one of the threads here i came across a statement on the advantages of the XSLT mapping over other mappings which says ‘File content conversion at receiver side can be avoided in case of text or html output’. I have a Idoc to FIle scenario wherein I am currently using a combination of message mappping and a FCC at the recvr adapter. Can i use XSLT mapping instead of the combination currently in use stated above? Also the file format expected is plain text format. I believe the XSLT mapping would generate a file with XML tags which is what i do not want. Please advise. ![]() Cenario: This scenario describes the steps involved in configuration of the receiver file adapter with file content conversion. File Content Conversion. XI - File Content Conversion.Previous Developments on Integration Directory. Ducati ecu flash software. Configuration of Sender File Adapter Here specify Message Protocol as ‘File Content Conversion’. Document Name and Namespace correspond to the message type from the Integration Repository. However, i would like this to be explained with an example to make it more clear Source Idoc: ABCD 123 @#$ Target file: 000ABCD123 00@#$ Can you suggest the mapping i would need to employ for this? _________________________________________________________ This, can be the answer.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |